Chris Huff wrote:
> 
> 
> Basically what I am talking about is floating lumps of snow and
> slush...bits of stuff which sheared off when the floes separated and
> bumped into each other. Right now it seems strange that the floes
> separated cleanly, without smaller pieces breaking off.
> 

I already understood that :-) just did not yet have time to work it out.

[...]
> 
> But that doesn't answer my real question...what "manual changes"
> wouldn't be possible with isosurfaces? Why would CSG be needed with
> isosurfaces, but not with height fields?
>

Sorry if I wasn't clear enough, I meant painting away certain structures in the
heightfield file, that i do not like.  Of course you do not neccessarily need
CSG to do that with isosurfaces, you could change the isosurface function, but
it would never be that simple IMO.

Christoph

--
Christoph Hormann <chr### [at] gmxde>
Homepage: http://www.schunter.etc.tu-bs.de/~chris/

Post a reply to this message